dkline1974 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This is why more people should have voted Nader / Gonzalez... Their platform was consumer protection environmental protection and anti-corporate power. If enough people would have pulled their heads out for air, Obama would have won anyway AND the democratic party would have been forced to look at these issues instead of putting lip service to it. Like whats happening now. A return to the Clinton era... Is that real "Change"(tm)?

captwasabi (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard and that is a fact.

captwasabi (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Unfortunately that smart guy with the smug look is going to do far worse to set us up for an even greater dilemma further down the road. Roosevelt and his New Deal and Legislation like the Community Reinvestment Act (passed by Carter) is what has set us up for this failure. The more we try to control the market the worse things will get.

BogFrog (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

shut up nobody knows what ther talking about because their is no such thing as a fact.

theoutlawjoseywales (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You say you don't understand how it works. As a kid, did you ever have one of those small metal gyroscopes? Did you understand how it worked? Probably not, but you knew that the more you tried to hold on and keep it still, the more it thrashed around in your hands. Only when you let go could you observe it in its state of natural equilibrium.The market is similar - political ideologies aside, the fact is that it is an absolute. The less we try to control it, the better off we will be.

realityhittingme (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

He's saying you shouldn't trust elite individuals, but votes for Obama who wants to expand our government; way to go dumbass. For those of you who don't know economics, listen to what Milton Friedman has to say.

orientrat (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Philosophically, "Economics" does not relate at all with ECONOMY. It does relate to monetary aspects (Parasitism); which obviously means inefficiency everywhere, including the lives of the parasites; their opulent-ways can not even begin to satisfy their needs. I wrote ECONOMY, but in reality there are ECONOMIES, which are always inexorably interacting, of which those so-called economists don't have a clue."-jjojjorge-Tell me more Jorge!! Your incorrectly used big words dazzle me!

jjojjorge (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Philosophically, "Economics" does not relate at all with ECONOMY. It does relate to monetary aspects (Parasitism); which obviously means inefficiency everywhere, including the lives of the parasites; their opulent-ways can not even begin to satisfy their needs. I wrote ECONOMY, but in reality there are ECONOMIES, which are always inexorably interacting, of which those so-called economists don't have a clue.

sisforshayla (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

really good video! you say what i've been thinking! :)

saraphonic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

these videos are great for my ADD