belledumonde07 (October 12, 2008 at 2:21 pm)

Oh yeah, her diction is appauling! Yeah right. What are you on, seriously?!

RossShaddick (October 12, 2008 at 12:14 pm)

Hmm...well she's half way there!(and her popularity helps bring classical music to a wider audience)I think the Dean should have given this song a try himself ! lol

mra2zee (October 10, 2008 at 8:51 pm)

You think that voice suits a male? rofl, are you deaf? or just plain dumb? Or are you being ignorant just to make your comment seem like it has some substance? Her voice is no where near as deep as a males voice. You're a retard for thinking so, and if you said it just to give yourself an arguement agaisnt her singing, then thats also retarded :)

309633246 (October 10, 2008 at 8:42 pm)

You're absolutely right, she isn't, I don't know why the title "opera singer" gets thrown around so freely like that.

loftie30 (October 10, 2008 at 7:41 pm)

i cannot stand her singing, shes raspy, and far too deep, her diction is appaling. shes murdered a classic tune, shes so deep she should be in a male voice. shes made it because shes easy on the eye only! shes been lucky there are far better singers out there and i get annoyed when the class her as an opera singer, which she clearly is not.

musicianatpeace (October 4, 2008 at 9:35 am)

even though she can sing high notes.. but her weakness is her breathing.. she cannot let the high note stay for a long period of time..

GermanOperaSinger (September 29, 2008 at 2:07 am)

Why do they call her an opera singer? She's not an opera singer.

budgie80091 (September 24, 2008 at 8:38 pm)

sam loves catherine

keepbeingPhat (September 22, 2008 at 10:56 am)

You can't really compare Katherine with Charice - they are both amazing amazing singers, But Katherine is singing it in an opera-ish tone while Charice has a more pop/soul voice. They're both great :)

bigchloe (September 20, 2008 at 1:13 pm)

shes amazin !!