|
allread123 (July 2, 2008 at 6:05 am)
fgshgaqergaegfadfhagsdfhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
designingpatrick (March 12, 2008 at 5:32 pm)
this is nothing new, if you use 3d applications effectively then you tend to customize your interface, program unique variables, develop results based on results. The process of animating a character is a beautiful merge of programming and art. Most people don't care to spend the time doing this sort of thing though...
audiocreator (February 8, 2008 at 8:27 pm)
thats some straight forward awesomeness right there
Dejaiin (January 20, 2008 at 3:27 pm)
Interesting ideal. But is it really possible I program but how do we get the rest of the population into programing via an interface? Would that not make it worse for programmers? It would side to the usable.. Oh well good talk.
tricky778 (December 27, 2007 at 7:56 pm)
nip2 is an example application that has function composition into pipelines for image processing.
F00dTube (December 11, 2007 at 3:37 pm)
Being sold or not is not really important now is it? It either works for you or it doesn't. And in certain environments you just don't have a choice.
iggy4323 (December 10, 2007 at 10:06 pm)
I'm not sold on functional programming either, and I agree with gmvsea about the rift.
gmvsea (December 8, 2007 at 1:31 am)
This was a surprisingly good lecture. Although I am still not sold on functional programming, I have to admit that the presenter's description of the rift between applications usability and code composibility was an epiphany for me. I am grateful.I think that at least the first part of this lecture should be required reading (viewing) for all software developers.
freebit50 (November 21, 2007 at 4:24 pm)
Thank you for fixing the sound. -Joe |