|
cre8ivelicense (July 27, 2008 at 3:11 pm)
stupid american
azdana (July 4, 2008 at 5:30 am)
I agree with those that say this is taken out of context. How does dressing in drag prove discrimination? Next thing we know, you'll be compiling a list of actors and comedians that have "dolled up" for a laugh and file a class action suit against them as well.
esoeso122 (June 18, 2008 at 2:20 am)
Wal*Mart is making the USA poor.
hahayouarefunny (June 5, 2008 at 1:32 am)
"You can make any of those Wal-Mart suits crap themselves with one word: "UNION".But then most Wal-Mart employees don't have the balls to go there." - lastofthewild1sThat's a pretty cold and simplified view of the employees.
downwithderek (May 31, 2008 at 6:59 pm)
Walmart fired a hardworker of 4 years without a reason or even a penny to feed the worker and his family. What will all the big-wigs say to the God on judgement day.
Stacey9977 (May 8, 2008 at 1:21 am)
I came across this from a link on myspace. This whole thing has been totally taken out of context. This is more or less a womanless pageant, which is all for fun and giggles. It looks as though you guys need to look up the meaning of the word discrimination before you post this stuff making you looks more like hopeless fools.
Bytesmiths (May 4, 2008 at 12:45 am)
I'm sorry, but can you say, "Don't joke about serious things." What if the Mall*Wart CEO were up there telling racial jokes in the context of making a business point?The fact that they think they can joke about patting female employee's asses means they don't take sexism serious -- probably like ness2728.
lastofthewild1s (May 4, 2008 at 12:44 am)
Lee Scott must not think women are even good for that. He looks like he craves man meat.You can make any of those Wal-Mart suits crap themselves with one word: "UNION".But then most Wal-Mart employees don't have the balls to go there.
scir91 (April 30, 2008 at 4:20 am)
women are good for sex! everything else comes second.
ness2728 (April 26, 2008 at 12:13 am)
I'm sorry, but, can you say "taken out of context"? |
