heresastraw (December 31, 2006 at 4:45 am)

The infantry req're tank and artillery support--that is why they send a "Battle Group".

hetman11 (December 26, 2006 at 7:57 pm)

Finally at least we now have a government in power that gives a shit about the armed forces and is investing the dollars to boot. (I hope the liberals never get back into power).

grman (December 21, 2006 at 6:22 pm)

in the strictest sense fo the word those aren't 1s. they are kind of a hybrid between 1s and 2s...we call them C2s...check out our defence website for more info

JustACivvy (December 21, 2006 at 3:36 am)

It's been put on public domain by the armed forces (combat camera) so I would guess they know it's safe to release to the public

JustACivvy (December 21, 2006 at 3:34 am)

Those are from our country we know what kind of equipment we have thank you very much...

Kyle359 (December 21, 2006 at 1:11 am)

Right now, the Tories are reaping the benefits of Paul Martin's last three balanced budgets. If they're as bad with Canadians' money as they've historically been, we'll end up with junk anyway. The words LSVW and Iltis come readily to mind now. Point: no matter who's in government, if they have to choose between the Army and, well, just about anything else, the Army gets the leftovers.

feadus (December 20, 2006 at 4:56 am)

least you knew what I meant

shamgarsan (December 20, 2006 at 4:52 am)

Close. This is the first time that canadian tanks have engaged in combat since the Korean war. Canadian tanks were part of 4CMBG stationed in Germany throughout the cold war. Leopard C1s from the Strathcona's were also deployed as part of KFOR in Kosovo.

feadus (December 20, 2006 at 4:19 am)

This is the first time since the korean war that canadian tanks have been on foreign soil :)

shamgarsan (December 20, 2006 at 4:12 am)

They're Leopard C2s, not C1s. That's what DND is saying, and they look like C2s with MEXAS to me. Whether they are the same units that went to Kosovo, that's never been stated anywhere I've seen.