|
sinshenlong (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
totally agree, the movie found some angles bt there was not enough time i guess
sinshenlong (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the book is nothin like the movie . the movies concept was somewhat better bt.... in some aspects the book was better especially when dealing with chistiens character
FrequencyGenerator (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i loved the way this film made me feel when i imagined that i could jump in and out of banks with loads of cash. or to exotic locations. did me a lot of good.
bitchslapper12 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Blunty fucking old shitty bastard trying to act as a popular kid!
Glaceon364 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i loved this film, a brilltastic 5/5
Jackbauer346 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
lol the book was totally different and it would have been sooooooo boring if they kept the book's actual storyline. anyways, doug liman needs to go back to film school so he can recover his bourne identity skills.
925azn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
a novel, plus your added 'your generation" crap doesn't make sense, stop making yourself sound important by criticizing others.
2SixGraders (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Cause it as a comic book along time ago, so mostly adults want to see it.Your generation knows nothing.
error0fcasualty (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I have to completely agree. But, I fell in love with the concept. Like they said, it'd have been awesome if they elaborated more on the whole history of the Jumpers and Paladins. Instead, it's sort of spat out, and you're left questioning the whole thing.However, I abored the action scenes. Hell! They were fighting around the freaking world. One minute they're in Egypt and then *BAM* they're in China.Anyways, it's one of those classic cases... The book was most likely/definitely better.
ninino86 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the movie was ok...but could have been MUCH better... |
