catehalatu (June 29, 2008 at 1:41 pm)

hey do you have this computer for playng or for benchmarcks????? are you are on mision one=)))))))

mizonee (June 6, 2008 at 2:10 am)

playing it on low res on a 30inch mate ur a joke.

mizonee (June 6, 2008 at 2:09 am)

stress test fool....

TurkWingTsun (June 1, 2008 at 7:37 pm)

my pc : 8800gtx768mb , 5.2 ghz dual , 3gb rami play this game at full gfx DX10 on 1360x768 [16:9] . i get full fps with aa . why do you play this game on 2560x1600 ? thats why you get slow fps .

joblagz (May 28, 2008 at 12:31 am)

2560x1600 for lost planet? not worth it.. i play it by 1920x1080 everything high and i still get 59.8 avg..

chunkybut555 (May 20, 2008 at 10:56 pm)

Lol you talk werid.Im stck on Red Eye Though=(

CodeVeroby (May 13, 2008 at 6:38 pm)

1024X767=786432 Pixels VS 2560X1600=40960000 He runs the game at about 50 times higher resolution you idiout !

lragone9s (May 11, 2008 at 5:33 am)

well an xbox 360 would be a smarter investment, judging by the price of a gaming computer, and most games arriving in the xbox first,and later to the pc. And aren't the xbox 360 graphics enough eye candy?

arggamer (May 5, 2008 at 3:09 am)

"lol".. but.. you all are not getting the point of my coment.. you don't need to raise up to that res!.. you can play it very well with a cheaper PC, or you can play it at 1600x1200, or 1920x1080 on widescreen with good performance.. get it?.."what's the deal Buying an expensive video card (and others expensive parts too) and get only 24 fps????" you want to play? or watch a powerpoint slideshow?

FOOSAG (May 4, 2008 at 3:57 am)

obviously...1024x768 compared with 2560x1600??? uh...no