|
Justforkix11315 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hey look I can sneeze at WTC7 and make it fall down too!omglolsuperficialdamage
Justforkix11315 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
OMG Murph is still here.Bush must still be paying him.Murph believes in dissapearing aircraft engines and fake planes crashes.Keep taking those meds Murph you not crazy
axeman098 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Okay, having done CCTV work for years, including both on military bases and Nuclear Power facilities, I will professionally refute that statement. Modern PTZ cameras such as the ones at the pentagon, could not only capture it, but you TRACK IT AS AN OBJECT provided they were in a position to aquire the plane as a moving target. The CCTV systems at the pentagon are arrainged in such a way as to overlap....providing as few blind spots as possible. At the VERY least, the VDOT beltway Cam saw it all
questionstreet (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ZERO: An Investigation Into 9/11This 2008 documentary explores the latest scientific evidence & dramatic new witness testimony which directly conflicts with the US government's account.The importance of this film can not be overstated. The justification for going to war in Iraq is built on a series of outrageous lies.video *DOT* google *DOT* com/videoplay?docid=2296490368603788739&eDVD QUALITY TORRENTmininova *DOT* org/tor/1946339SITEzero911movie *DOT* com/site/
Murph9000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There are a good number of photographs publicly available showing aircraft wreckage at the Pentagon.Can you offer any proof that the cores of the engines were not found at the pentagon? Unless you can demonstrate that they were not found, you cannot reliably claim "that is a fact", no matter how badly you abuse your caps lock key.
Murph9000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
As for my political persuasion, it is not relevant to this discussion, and you just undermine your own credibility by bringing it up. That said, I'll gladly state that I think Bush Jr. is a blithering idiot and possibly the worst president that the world has been forced to endure.The people doing the real disservice to the victims of 9/11 are those who continue to stir groundless conspiracy theories without providing a shred of conclusive evidence to support them.
Murph9000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There is no conclusive evidence of the use of thermite or thermate. The so-called evidence completely ignored the other possible sources of the compounds claimed to be proof of their use. It also entirely failed to find any evidence of the compounds created by the thermite or thermate reactions. There are many legitimate sources of the compounds claimed to be proof of thermite/thermate in the WTC dust.
axeman098 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I simply cannot believe some of you idiots on here that have the GALL to arbitrarily write off 9/11 to the official story. When, or should I say IF you can sit down with ALL the available evidence in an unbiased fashion and take the time to SEE everything that doesn't add up. The official story is LAUGHABLE. SHOW ME ONE PEICE OF A JETLINER THAT HIT THE PENTAGON! WHERE WERE THE TWO 6 TON ROLLS ROYCE ENGINES? FIRE ***DOES NOT*** VAPORIZE THESE, yet...THEY WERE NEVER FOUND...THAT IS A FACT.
axeman098 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Then you're either an idiot or a Bush Republican. Denial is a sad thing in the face of OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE you retard. Nevermind the molten metal found at the site, or the MULTIPLE traces of Thermite and Thermate residue found. These are undeniable and irrefutable, yet fucking morons like you choose to bury your head in the sand and believe the brainwashing. You're pathetic if you choose to believe what SCIENCE has already proven to be untrue. You do a disservice to all those lost that day.
CusterFlux (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hey, keep it down - concrete is sensitive, and turns to powder upon insult: you heartless bastards. |
