|
siamesefish (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Lol stupid idiot
siamesefish (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Moron
mustardjunkie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Ullrich was sick on Alp'dHuez stage though too.
mustardjunkie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
2003 was a wicked nasty year for doping, it was truly out of control completely. Francisco Casagrande went from 100th ranked U23 rider a few yrs earlier to super alien dominating cow blood boy hamilton in the mountains of Romandie...
mustardjunkie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Pharmstrong dehydrated and had the flue, therefore had to keep his heamotocrit level down for a few days using no transfusions slowing him down massively.Or else he took a drug like Oxyglobin or heamopure and got sick like Jesus Manzano did that same week.
thiago497150 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Good times!
alexvino99 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ullrich was better cause he was anti-biotika and then you cant ride hard. he was on that the first mountain stages and lost 3-4 minutes and ended a minute behind after winning time trial and he tok also time in the mountains
athlete117 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Armstrong won by a minute. How was Ullrich better? Do remember, Lance lost 1.30 in the time trial, if Ullrich was better, he'd have capitalised on that in the mountains. The fact is, Lance was always a better climber than Ullrich. When Lance had a bad day in the mountains he lost seconds. When Ullrich had a bad day in the mountains, he lost minutes.
joule162534 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
well then read reports by jesus manzano, jaksche,zabel, aldag,riis and many more.. they tell you how easy this is
joule162534 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
maybe you didn't wath the tour in 2003???? armstrong lost 1:30 in the time trial und the day later another 15 seconds. on the tourmalet armstrong was in difficulties, too. in 2003 ullrich was better than armstrong but ullrich was ill in the alps |
