123blockhome (October 11, 2008 at 3:22 pm)

Anyway, sounds like a 3 letter fictional character you may have heard of, but without his five letter counterpart.

123blockhome (October 11, 2008 at 3:21 pm)

3:57, The 'all-encompassing program' which operates by 'unconditional altruism' MUST be connected in some way to our 'program/filter/ego' for us to be able to reach it, there is no other way! If it is connected to some 'route' or 'pathway' in between the two, then it really isn't all-encompassing is it? If it is really 'unconditional altruism' and a 'single benevolent force', then it would have reached out already, since it is a 'force' and can act 'without limitation'!

123blockhome (October 11, 2008 at 3:21 pm)

1:46 - 2:35, 'life is more complex than you (singular) can sense'. And if he can't simplify things like this to make you understand, then why should you listen.3:30, for 'program' he could have just said 'filter', but he's trying to convince you that you are currently programmed.3:50, '(program=ego) --> will to receive' is all just our natural filter.

123blockhome (October 11, 2008 at 3:20 pm)

This guy talks so deceptively, he's making things overcomplicated by anybody's standards and so i immediately don't trust him. If you simplify his words at various points you get:

123blockhome (October 11, 2008 at 12:42 pm)

There are actually between 9 and 21 senses depending on your point of view - saw it on QI last night.

trakkaton (October 10, 2008 at 9:43 pm)

Uuh, overestimated.1. Whether there is something like "light" or "radiation" or "nanometers" is pure speculation. As I am slave to my senses, they can't be checked for accuracy. "Reality" is as "real" as a dream. -> Descartes.2. You mix up "green" and "electromagnetic radiation at a certain frequency". Both have nothing to do with each other. The taste of garlic has nothing to do with the ingredients of garlic. One is an undescribable perception, the other a model inside of your dreams.

trakkaton (October 10, 2008 at 9:37 pm)

If you watch a dog attacking a man you would stop the dog, not because you are the man, but because you decide that it is wrong for the man to be attacked.

trakkaton (October 10, 2008 at 9:34 pm)

You obviously don't know physiology experiments with yogis. The mind can bend what you call reality.

illevity (October 10, 2008 at 10:17 am)

what greater tool than the scientist himself? and what greater force to measure against than the force of bestowal?there exists the science that is kabbalah, and everything else.

TuesdaysThursdays (October 10, 2008 at 3:22 am)

To rebut you, not for your sake, but for those with minds, I quote::illevity:"where the hell did you read that a kabbalist rejects his ego? without the ego a kabbalist is not a scientist!he uses his ego correctly! by measuring it against the upper light an inner prayer is made that the creator transforms his 'will to receive for the sake of receiving' to 'receiving for the sake of bestowal'"End QuoteI am sorry for you, and disgusted at your use of 'Scientist', you sin against humanity.